County will decide on eminent domain move

Posted by Howard Rich | Issues, News, Property Rights | Monday 14 September 2009 4:17 pm

By JENNA CHANDLER

THE PORTERVILLE RECORDER


will consider using its power again Tuesday at a regular board of supervisors meeting.

The seizure of a 40-foot-wide by 1-mile-long parcel would be used in the county’s Road 80 widening project.

An attempt to thwart the land grab was made Sept. 1 by property owner Willemina Van Grouw when she asked the county to prove it would be cheaper to take her land rather than use county-owned property on the other side of Road 80.

The question prompted supervisors to postpone their vote until Tuesday, although they voted unanimously to take two other parcels owned by Arie De Jong and Pier Van Der Hoek and Darlene Van Der Hoek.

Contract dispute

Also at Tuesday’s meeting, supervisors will determine the salary and benefit plans for employees of the Public Defender’s and District Attorney’s offices, all members of the union Government Lawyers Association of Workers.
At contention: GLAW believes its members are working under a contract effective through June 30, 2010, which ’s Human Resource’s department disputes.

Human Resources is asking the board to approve its last, best and final offer made to GLAW’s bargaining unit, which includes the suspension of several benefit packages and a 40-hour furlough.

The county has settled with all other unions, and they have agreed to similar terms, according to County Administrative Officer Jean Rousseau.

Budget adoption

At 1:30 p.m., after their regular meeting, supervisors are scheduled to vote on the 2009-2010 recommended budget of $923.3 million.

Compared to last year, the proposed budget is slimmer by $27.5 million, or 2.9 percent.

The meets in Board Chambers in the County Administrative Office, 2800 W. Burrel Ave., Visalia.

– Contact Jenna Chandler at 784-5000, Ext. 1050, or jchandler@portervillerecorder.com.

A Lesson from Across the Pond

Posted by Howard Rich | Columns, News | Wednesday 26 August 2009 11:45 am

As states like , and struggle to make up for steep multi-billion dollar budget deficits while they totter on the brink of insolvency, there is one option for reducing those shortfalls that is making real headway across the Atlantic Ocean.

It all revolves around cutting the public sector. It’s time to try it here.

is faced with a €20 billion deficit and borrowing €400 million a week just to keep afloat. Colm McCarthy, the chairman of —a cost-cutting bureau in —knows the stakes. And he sees no way around cutting public sector pay by some €5.3 billion. Government officials agree. So far, the left-of-center government refuses to rule anything out in the Bord Snip report.

Writes The Sunday Times on July 19th, “ is like a household that has been living beyond its means and now finds itself deep in hock to the bank. Unless we show a willingness to reduce our spending, [international] lending may dry up, forcing us into the arms of the European Central Bank which will have to mount an IMF-style rescue to prevent a euro currency crisis.”

is not alone. Poland just announced a cut of 12,000 government employees. No silly furloughs or dodgy accounting tricks. A straight reduction in the number of public sector workers. And the government warns that if revenues do not increase, further reductions will be forthcoming. Other nations in Europe are actively considering similar or even deeper cuts.

The basic problems faces are quite similar to those in , and other states in the U.S.: Public sector workers make far more than their private sector counterpart.

An October 2007 survey from ’s Central Statistics Office showed that the average hourly earnings in the public sector were far greater than in the private sector. Average earnings per hour in the public sector were €26.67 compared with €18.07 per hour in the private sector. Public sector wages are 48% higher.

And how do , and others match up?

According to the ’ recently published study for 2007, in , which is still trying to climb out of its oppressive $26 billion deficit, average annual income for state employees was $56,777 versus $49,935 for the private sector, a 14 percent gap. In , a similar story emerges: $53,925 for state workers, and $48,006 for the private sector, an 11 percent split. : $57,845 average state salary, $53,590 for private sector workers, at an 8 percent difference. And these differences don’t take into account the excessive fringe benefits enjoyed by public sector workers. The bottom-line is that we pay the public sector more, in some cases far more, than corresponding workers in private business.

Nationally, the story is even worse. Federal workers made on average $64,871 in 2007, with private sector workers making a meager $44,362, so public sector wages in the federal system are 46% higher.

If , and other spendthrift state governments ever hope to emerge in the black, they must now implement what some may consider draconian fiscal measures. Cutting public sector pay makes the most sense. In , for example, if workers received a 12.1 percent pay cut, leveling the playing field with the private sector, the state would save $3.1 billion.

Cutting the total workforce down by 10 percent is a real move that saves $5.4 billion annually and many billions more over time. Similar approaches would save taxpayers annually $1.3 billion in and .

The fact is, the Irish are on to something. By facing the reality of their situation head-on and acting in a responsible manner, they are far more likely to weather the financial storm than are the compulsive spenders in the US. It is high time we embrace the pluck of the Irish here.

The author is Chairman of Americans for Limited Government and Liberty Features Syndicated writer

e-wallet Wordpress Theme